Strategy Leaderboard
Rank every strategy by the metric and period you choose, or open Strategies, Performance or Annual returns.
Compare 187 tactical and fixed asset allocation strategy variants ranked by performance over each strategy's full available history.
Data as of 2026-10-01
Sorted by Sharpe (descending).
Showing 100 of 187 strategies
| Select to compare | # | Strategy | 1Y | 3Y | CAGR | Years | Max DD | Sharpe (descending) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -15.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.54. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 2 | 19.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.9%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.49. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 3 | 3.8%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 65.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -7.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.49. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 4 | 22.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.47. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 5 | 6.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 65.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -10.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.43. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 6 | 30.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 19.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.34. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 7 | GGCEM Link Original (SPY/VEU, IEF/BIL)Family: Global Growth Cycle Enhanced Momentum (Link) moderateTacticalUCITS | 8.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.32. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 8 | 27.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 21.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -27.9%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.29. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 9 | 30.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 24.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -28.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.28. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 10 | 11.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.28. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 11 | 18.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.28. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 12 | 16.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.27. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 13 | 22.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.27. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 14 | 13.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.26. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 15 | 20.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.9%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.26. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 16 | 25.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 23.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.9. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -17.7%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.25. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 17 | 4.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -16.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.25. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 18 | 31.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 20.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 26.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -36.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.24. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 19 | 7.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 48.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.24. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 20 | 24.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 20.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -21.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.24. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 21 | 10.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.24. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 22 | 17.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.24. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 23 | 35.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 25.7%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 27.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -36.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.23. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 24 | 3.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -26.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.23. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 25 | 28.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 25.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -16.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.23. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 26 | 12.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.22. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 27 | 18.7%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -17.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.22. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 28 | GGCEM Standard (SPY/IEFA, AGG/BIL)Family: Global Growth Cycle Enhanced Momentum (Link) moderateTacticalUCITS | 5.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.21. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 29 | 13.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -24.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.19. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 30 | 12.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.5. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -23.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.19. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 31 | Dynamic Macro Allocation (Sadek) TacticalUCITS | 23.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 25.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 32.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.18. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 32 | 9.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.8%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -24.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.18. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 33 | 10.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.3. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.18. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 34 | 9.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -16.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.18. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 35 | Predicting US Treasury Returns TacticalUCITS | 1.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 3.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 4.6%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.6. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -10.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.18. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 36 | 10.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.17. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 37 | 20.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 22.9%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.17. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 38 | 8.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.7%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.17. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 39 | 5.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 53.5. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -12.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.17. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 40 | 9.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -13.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.17. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 41 | 8.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.16. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 42 | 2.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 53.5. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -12.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.16. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 43 | 9.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 19.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 34.6. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -23.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.16. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 44 | 7.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 48.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.15. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 45 | 28.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 20.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -23.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.15. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 46 | 12.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.14. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 47 | 9.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -18.4%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.14. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 48 | 10.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 3.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -29.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 49 | 12.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -24.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 50 | 21.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 22.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -21.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 51 | 20.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 20.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -32.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 52 | Golden Ratio moderateFixedUCITS | 9.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 31.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 53 | 22.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -15.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 54 | Golden Butterfly moderateFixedUCITS | 7.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.3%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 55 | 11.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -15.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.13. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 56 | 4.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 65.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -17.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.12. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 57 | 12.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -16.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.12. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 58 | 27.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 25.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 31.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 44.6. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -52.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.11. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 59 | 6.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 21.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 48.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -32.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.11. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 60 | 30.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 23.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -38.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.11. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 61 | 7.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.9. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -18.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.11. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 62 | 30.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 31.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.9. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -25.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.10. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 63 | 9.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -25.8%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.10. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 64 | 10.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.9%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.10. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 65 | Permanent Portfolio (Static) conservativeFixedUCITS | 4.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 47.8. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -18.4%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.10. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 66 | 4.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -21.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.10. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 67 | 10.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 21.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -16.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.09. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 68 | 4.6%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.3. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -21.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.08. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 69 | 26.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 24.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 52.6. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -47.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.07. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 70 | 9.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -27.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.07. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 71 | 15.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -25.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.07. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 72 | 14.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -30.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.07. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 73 | 26.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 30.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 30.8%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 44.6. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -52.5%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.06. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 74 | 24.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 29.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -36.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.06. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 75 | All Weather (Dalio) conservativeFixedUCITS | 5.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 54.8. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.06. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | |
| 76 | 14.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 31.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 19.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.5. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -37.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.05. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 77 | 11.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 19.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -24.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.05. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 78 | 4.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 6.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.3. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -24.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.05. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 79 | 7.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -14.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.05. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 80 | 22.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 43.5%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 24.7%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.0. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -76.2%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.04. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 81 | 19.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 20.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.4%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -33.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.04. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 82 | 2.0%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 6.8%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 41.1. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -33.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.03. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 83 | 18.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.6. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -32.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.03. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 84 | 8.7%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -32.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.02. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 85 | 2.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.9%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.7. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -20.1%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.02. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 86 | 4.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 13.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 35.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -25.0%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.02. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 87 | 18.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.4%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.02. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 88 | 20.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 24.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 8.4%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 44.5. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.02. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 89 | 13.5%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 35.2%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 25.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 54.5. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -45.6%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.01. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 90 | 8.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 22.3%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 14.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -29.6%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.01. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 91 | 15.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.0%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.8%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -35.9%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.01. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 92 | 13.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 18.4%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -30.4%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.01. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 93 | 4.3%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.8%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 11.7%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.8. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -26.3%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.01. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 94 | 16.2%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 36.6%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 26.1%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 54.5. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -47.6%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 95 | 24.4%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 26.0%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 23.6. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -27.5%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 96 | 3.6%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.6%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.7%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 34.6. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -32.7%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 97 | 8.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 16.4%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 12.0%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -33.1%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 98 | 19.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 17.9%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 9.2%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 40.6. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -22.3%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 99 | 19.1%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 15.2%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 7.8%. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 38.9. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -21.8%. middle relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 1.00. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | ||
| 100 | 20.6%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 24.7%. highest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 10.1%. lower relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 44.5. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | -19.5%. higher relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. | 0.99. lowest relative band among 100 comparable rows shown. |
Rendering the first 100 rows. Show all to reveal 87 more.
Max DD is the canonical backtest figure, the worst peak-to-trough decline measured on daily NAV, the same number the strategy page shows. On Full History each strategy is measured over its own available history, so the Years column tells you how long each drawdown window is (a 100-year record and a 15-year one are not directly comparable). The optional Max DD (Weekly) column (under Show all columns) samples the NAV weekly for query speed from the performance series, so it can differ from the Max DD column.
Get the signals for these strategies
BestFolio computes monthly rebalancing signals for every strategy above. Build your custom blended portfolio, get trade lists, and execute with one click.
6 strategies free forever. Pro unlocks all 187+ strategies with signals.
About this leaderboard
This leaderboard ranks tactical and fixed asset allocation strategies by their trailing returns over multiple time horizons. All performance data comes from rigorous backtests using actual ETF prices and proxy chains extending back decades, with our deepest histories reaching the 1920s.
Trailing returns (1M, 3M, YTD, 1Y) show recent cumulative performance. Multi-year returns (3Y, 5Y) are annualized. CAGR represents the compound annual growth rate over the selected leaderboard window. For a custom start year, the window begins on Jan 1 of that year or at the strategy's later inception; the Years column shows the actual coverage used for each row.
Risk metrics include maximum drawdown (worst peak-to-trough decline), Sharpe ratio (risk-adjusted return), Sortino ratio (downside-adjusted return), and annualized volatility.
Stability, available under Show all columns beside Robustness, measures how consistently the rolling 3-year Sharpe stayed above zero. It changes with the selected period and currency, and needs at least ten years of monthly history.
Strategy categories include momentum, trend-following, risk parity, mean reversion, and static/fixed allocations from respected authors like Keller, Dalio, Bernstein, Ferri, and others.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. All returns shown are backtested using historical data and may not reflect actual trading results. Backtests are subject to look-ahead bias, survivorship bias, and other limitations. This is not financial advice. Always do your own research before investing.