Skip to content
Important: BestFolio provides information for educational purposes only. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Read full disclaimer
·7 min read·BestFolio Research Team

What works where you live: the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Switzerland and Singapore

If you invest from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Switzerland or Singapore, the account you hold a tactical strategy in matters more than the strategy. In an IRA, a Roth, an RRSP, a TFSA, an ISA or a SIPP, tactical allocation keeps almost all of its return. In a taxable account in the US, Canada, the UK or Australia, tax takes 1.9 to 2.6 points a year off the median strategy.

When we published What works where you live on 8 October, it covered 9 European countries and Israel. Many BestFolio members invest from somewhere else, so version 2.1 adds those 6 countries: 14 more accounts, each with its rules in plain words and the primary sources we read them from. There is also a warning scenario for Swiss investors classed as professional traders.

The method is unchanged. We test the same 107 unleveraged strategies, each with the monthly allocations of its backtest, from January 2006 to August 2026. Today's tax rules apply to the whole period, each investor starts with the equivalent of EUR 100,000, and everything is sold at the end, so buy and hold pays its deferred tax too. One thing is new: these accounts also tax or withhold distributions every year, because they hold distributing US ETFs or are taxed on a fund's reported income.

Account by account

CountryAccountMedian strategy, before / after taxTax cost a yearStrategies that beat a 60/40 with a smaller fall
United StatesTaxable8.9% / 7.1%1.9 points41 of 107
United StatesTraditional IRA or 401(k), Roth8.9% / 8.9%050
CanadaTaxable10.1% / 7.6%2.6 points23
CanadaTFSA10.1% / 9.8%0.3 points36
CanadaRRSP10.1% / 10.1%031
United KingdomGeneral investment account10.5% / 8.1%2.3 points2
United KingdomISA, SIPP10.5% / 10.3%0.1 points5
AustraliaTaxable9.4% / 7.0%2.4 points7
AustraliaSuper (accumulation)9.4% / 8.1%1.2 points7
SwitzerlandPrivate investor, Swiss broker6.7% / 5.2%1.5 points36
SingaporeIrish UCITS ETFs7.7% / 7.6%0.1 points47
SingaporeUS ETFs7.7% / 7.1%0.7 points48

Returns are a year, in each account's currency, so compare within a row, not across rows. The Swiss professional-trader case is a warning scenario, not an account you choose, so it is not in the table or in any count (more on it below).

Horizontal bar chart of the tax cost of the median strategy in all 30 accounts, from 0.0 points a year in a US IRA or Roth and a Canadian RRSP to 5.2 points in an ordinary Irish account. The 14 accounts added in version 2 are in red: UK ISA and SIPP 0.1, Singapore through Irish UCITS ETFs 0.1, Canada TFSA 0.3, Singapore through US-listed ETFs 0.7, Australian super 1.2, Swiss private investor 1.5, US taxable 1.9, UK GIA 2.3, Australia taxable 2.4, Canada taxable 2.6.
Tax cost of the median strategy, account by account, in points of return a year. Red: the 14 accounts added in version 2. Blue: the 16 accounts of version 1, now with the 15% US withholding inside UCITS funds. Source: BestFolio Study 01, version 2.1, rules checked 22 October 2026.

4 things the new countries add

1. The retirement account is where a switcher belongs. In a US IRA or Roth, a Canadian RRSP, a British ISA or SIPP, switching is not taxed. The ISA and the SIPP still lose 0.1 points a year to the 15% US withholding inside the Irish funds that UK investors have to use. For the pension accounts we show untaxed growth: with the same tax rate when you contribute and when you withdraw, the deduction and the tax at withdrawal cancel out. The limits are the catch (USD 7,500 a year in an IRA, GBP 20,000 in an ISA), so most investors will hold their strategy across a sheltered and a taxable account. Many 401(k) plans also only offer a fixed menu of funds, not ETFs, so check yours.

2. In a taxable account, the holding period matters. The US taxes a gain held one year or less as income (24% for our investor) and a longer one at 15%; Australia halves the gain on anything held at least 12 months. That widens the gap between slow and fast strategies. In an Australian taxable account, BAA-G4 (annual turnover 5.5) drops from 39th of 107 before tax to 61st after tax, while LAA (annual turnover 0.3) rises from 45th to 25th. A US high earner pays 3.1 points a year instead of 1.9.

Scatter plots for 4 taxable accounts (United States median 1.9 points, Canada 2.6, United Kingdom GIA 2.3, Australia 2.4). Each dot is one strategy, with annual turnover across and tax cost a year up. In all 4 panels the dots rise from left to right with a wide spread; LAA sits at the low-turnover end and BAA-G4 near the high end.
Each dot is one strategy, placed by its before-tax minus its after-tax return a year and by how often it trades. LAA and BAA-G4 are marked in red. Source: BestFolio Study 01, version 2.1, backtests from January 2006 to August 2026.

3. Where gains are not taxed, the cost moves elsewhere. A Swiss private investor pays no tax on gains. But a Swiss broker charges 0.15% stamp duty on every buy and every sell of a foreign ETF, and dividends are taxed as income: 1.5 points a year, against 0.7 through a foreign broker. A Singapore investor pays no Singapore tax on gains or foreign dividends. But the US keeps 30% of US ETF dividends (0.7 points a year), and US ETFs are US assets, subject to US estate tax above USD 60,000. Through Irish UCITS funds the cost is 0.1 points and the estate tax question disappears.

4. Your currency changes the yardstick. The pound and the Canadian dollar fell in 2008, which cushioned dollar assets. In a taxable account a 60/40 fell 12% at worst in pounds and 19% in Canadian dollars, against 28% in US dollars. That makes a sterling 60/40 very hard to beat on risk: even in an ISA, only 5 of 107 strategies beat it with a smaller fall, while 28 beat the S&P 500 held throughout.

Same account, a different situation

Each account has a base investor (a single US filer in the 24% bracket, an Ontario resident on CAD 120,000, a UK higher-rate taxpayer, an Australian in the 30% bracket, a Zurich resident on CHF 100,000). The country pages also show what changes when your situation differs:

AccountWhat changesTax cost a year, base caseTax cost a year, then
US taxableHigh earner (37% and 20%, plus the 3.8% net investment income tax)1.9 points3.1 points
Canada taxableFrequent trading taxed as business income2.6 points4.3 points
UK GIABasic-rate taxpayer2.3 points1.5 points
Australia taxableRules from 1 July 2027, ignoring cost indexing2.4 points2.9 points
Switzerland, private investorForeign broker, so no Swiss stamp duty1.5 points0.7 points
Switzerland, private investorClassed as a professional trader (warning scenario)1.5 points3.3 points
Singapore, US ETFsBond-fund distributions exempt from US withholding0.7 points0.3 points

What survives, across all 30 accounts

Tax barely reorders the top: in each of the 14 new accounts, the 5 best strategies before tax are still the 5 best after tax. What tax does is push the fast strategies down and the slow ones up. Across all 30 accounts, Equity + Managed Futures holds up in 27, LAA in 26 and Five-Asset Momentum Rotation in 24. The 3 GGCEM versions also hold up in up to 25; the study page explains why we leave them out of this list. At the other end, VAA-G4, KDA Top 4, Multi-Asset Momentum and FAA (annual turnover 7.0, 5.2, 4.3 and 3.8) hold up in none.

2 risks the numbers cannot show

Several tax authorities can treat frequent trading as a business. Switzerland's safe harbour for private investors requires holdings of at least 6 months, and 104 of the 107 strategies sell positions sooner. Missing it does not decide the case, because the tax office weighs all the circumstances. But if it classes you as a professional securities dealer, our warning scenario costs 3.3 points a year instead of 1.5. In Canada, the CRA can tax frequent trading as business income: 4.3 points instead of 2.6 in a taxable account in our test. A trading business carried on inside a TFSA makes it taxable. Singapore's IRAS can tax gains as trading income too, looking at frequency, holding period and intention. Neither the CRA nor IRAS publishes a threshold.

Rules also change. Australia replaces the 12-month discount on 1 July 2027 with inflation indexing of the cost and a 30% minimum tax on gains (Act No. 49 of 2026). Ignoring the indexing, the taxable account then costs 2.9 points a year instead of 2.4 in our test.

One correction for Europe and Israel

Irish and other European UCITS funds pay 15% US withholding on the dividends of the US shares they hold, and cannot reclaim it; a US-listed ETF does not. Version 1 left that out. It is now counted in every account that holds UCITS funds, so the figures of the first 16 accounts moved. The tax cost of the median strategy rose by about 0.1 point a year (Germany 1.9 to 2.0, Italy 3.1 to 3.2, Ireland 5.1 to 5.2), and the S&P 500 held throughout lost about 0.3. Strategies that hold US shares less often lose less, so a few more of them now beat a 60/40 with a smaller fall. US real estate funds are counted at the same 15% treaty rate, although whether it applies to a fund's REIT dividends is not confirmed. The study page lists every account before and after.

Read your country

Each country page has every account's rules, the sources and the date we checked them: United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Switzerland, Singapore. Pro members can rank every strategy in their own account, with the S&P 500 and the 60/40 of that account as rows. The table downloads as a CSV, with a decimal comma if your Excel expects one. Set your account under Settings, Where I invest, and each strategy page shows what your account does to it (the figures are part of Pro).

This is backtest research on published strategies, not tax advice. If a rule on these pages is wrong or out of date for you, tell us: the study is versioned and we fix it.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Backtested results are hypothetical and do not represent actual trading.

Written with the help of AI tools and reviewed before publication.

Share this article

Data and method

Study dates and assumptions are documented in the article and its revisions. Our current methodology explains the platform's data sources, proxy histories, trade timing and inflation treatment.

  • Five-Asset Momentum Rotation: the market's return at about two thirds of the volatility

    An unlevered monthly rotation across US stocks, bonds, REITs, commodities and gold that holds the top 3. On its 53.7-year card it beat the US market's return by about 2 points a year with about two thirds of the volatility on month-end returns, and its worst fall repaired in 20 months instead of 53. The catch is long stretches behind a rising stock market.

  • 5 New Strategies for October

    The October batch is live: 2 leveraged portfolios from r/LETFs, a momentum model that changes speed with the VIX, a five-fund rotation and Keller's Flexible Asset Allocation. The numbers are the ones on the strategy pages.

  • The poor man's trend program: three ETFs, one rule, 53 years of data

    Beyond Passive asked how close you can get to a futures trend program with three plain ETFs and one monthly trend rule. I rebuilt it on our engine back to 1972: the drawdown cut is real, robust to the signal choice, and honest about where the edge comes from.

Explore with tools

Try these strategies on BestFolio

Browse 88 tactical allocation strategies with monthly signals, walk-forward validation, and portfolio blending. Free to start.

Create free account

BestFolio Monthly Briefing

Liked this post? Get a free monthly recap of TAA strategy signals, performance rankings, and market regime updates. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.